Comments for The Biblioblog Top 50 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com The very best in Biblical Studies blogs Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:42:47 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by stephanielouisefisher http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1478 stephanielouisefisher Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:42:47 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1478 I know :-) I know :-)

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by Jim http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1475 Jim Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:12:49 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1475 hey now steph thats just wicked hey now steph thats just wicked

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by stephanielouisefisher http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1472 stephanielouisefisher Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:37:36 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1472 Well I'm not a boy and I'm playing - it's fun. Why such determination to see sexual discrimination where there isn't any? Well I’m not a boy and I’m playing – it’s fun. Why such determination to see sexual discrimination where there isn’t any?

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by Jim http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1467 Jim Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:55:35 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1467 envious? jealous? angry? bitter? envious? jealous? angry? bitter?

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by jkgayle http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1465 jkgayle Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:30:38 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1465 boys - playing king of the mountain boys – playing king of the mountain

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by stephanielouisefisher http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1453 stephanielouisefisher Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:21:48 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1453 ps... Ben and Scot are NOT sexy, NO pazang and scholarly depth, discernment and innovation are highly questionable. Jim Linville, Roland and Deane, have all the criteria wrapped up and far excell the likes of that depraved Jim West ;-)... and Tintin??? Jeepers creepers no accounting for taste! :-) ps… Ben and Scot are NOT sexy, NO pazang and scholarly depth, discernment and innovation are highly questionable. Jim Linville, Roland and Deane, have all the criteria wrapped up and far excell the likes of that depraved Jim West ;-)… and Tintin??? Jeepers creepers no accounting for taste! :-)

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by stephanielouisefisher http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1452 stephanielouisefisher Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:17:39 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1452 "I’m not listed because...?" Because. Chuck - I bet they did. And some people never will get it. The other one. Tough bikkies. Bashing never heard of before apologists and characterising Christians as fundamentalists and Christian faith as a delusion just doesn't cut the mustard. Not sexy, no pazang. “I’m not listed because…?”

Because.

Chuck – I bet they did. And some people never will get it.

The other one. Tough bikkies. Bashing never heard of before apologists and characterising Christians as fundamentalists and Christian faith as a delusion just doesn’t cut the mustard. Not sexy, no pazang.

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by Rob Kashow http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1448 Rob Kashow Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:58:23 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1448 come on just fill us in on the details, jim, and we'll stop bugging you. pretty please. come on just fill us in on the details, jim, and we’ll stop bugging you. pretty please.

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by iMark http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1446 iMark Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:51:30 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1446 OK, it's got to be calculated by PageRank rather than Alexa. Or a combination, but then there is the scholarly or academic biblical studies variable. Hmmmm.... OK, it’s got to be calculated by PageRank rather than Alexa. Or a combination, but then there is the scholarly or academic biblical studies variable.

Hmmmm….

]]> Comment on The Biblioblog Top 50 – December 2009 by Tommy Wasserman http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/top-50-december-2009/#comment-1445 Tommy Wasserman Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:45:37 +0000 http://biblioblogtop50.wordpress.com/?p=1014#comment-1445 Oh, sorry, I just realized that other blogs may have had larger fluctuations, whereas we have been steady. Oh, sorry, I just realized that other blogs may have had larger fluctuations, whereas we have been steady.

]]>